Collective Consciousness May Give You Psychic Abilities
Have you ever had the sensation that you are aware that someone is watching you? Or the sensation of thinking about someone right up to the moment when they call?
Some people have the opinion that these sensations are nothing more than a coincidence or a freak occurrence, but the fact that they are so widespread and something that everyone can identify with raises the likelihood that there is a metaphysical system at work here.
Now, a researcher by the name of Rupert Sheldrake has said that he thinks these events are the result of a psychic phenomenon that is proof of a collective awareness. He also observed that this idea has statistical significance.
Most people know Sheldrake for his idea of “morphic resonance,” which is a notion that focuses on psychic potential. Sheldrake is of the opinion that psychic capability is intrinsic to both humans and animals.
According to the theory of morphic resonance, natural processes and behavior, especially taught behavior, may be inherited and psychically transferred to subsequent generations.
Because he entertained such a vague idea, he was labeled a heretic in the scientific community, and as a result, he became something of an outcast in that group. In spite of this, he takes the criticism in stride and keeps moving forward with his studies.
The Evidence for a Collective Consciousness Provided by Sheldrake
Sheldrake wanted to put his idea to the test, so he ran a series of studies on a group of volunteers to see whether they could correctly identify the person who was calling them on the phone.
He conducted the experiment with two sets of callers: the first were people the subject knew, and the second were people the subject had never spoken to before.
The two groups competed against one another to determine whether or not there was a discernible connection between individuals who shared an emotional bond.
Sheldrake’s participants in each test group included four callers, which resulted in a chance of one in every four possible outcomes.
Out of 332 trials, including 37 participants, there was a success rate of 53% for subjects accurately identifying who was calling in the group of callers who had a strong personal connection to the topic. This is unquestionably an improvement over the likelihood that the subjects would guess correctly.
Subjects who were in groups with no prior acquaintance were only able to anticipate callers with a probability of 25 percent, which is the same as random chance.
Sheldrake recognized one aspect of the experiment that may have been defective, and that was the fact that callers were provided with a timetable of when they would be calling, and they might have disclosed when they’d be contacting the subject next if they were given the opportunity to do so.
But when he looked at the statistics and made sure this factor was taken into account, he discovered that there were no spikes in successful predicting. Does this suggest that individuals who have a personal connection have some kind of psychic link with one another?
Sheldrake decided to take the experiment one step further and ask the participants to assess their degree of confidence in whether or not they could correctly determine the identity of a caller.
They had the option of stating that they felt confident, that they did not feel confident, or that they were simply guessing. The outcomes were completely different as a consequence of this aspect.
When the participants reported feeling confident, the percentage of right responses increased to 82%. When they were unsure of themselves, they were accurate 35% of the time, but when they were just guessing, their guesses were only true 25% of the time.
One aspect of the experiment that drew my attention was the fact that the participants were often located hundreds of kilometers distant from their caller.
When Sheldrake carried out experiments relating premonitions to the content of incoming emails and text messages, he discovered comparable findings.
In addition to this, he states that despite the fact that the outcomes may have been influenced by a variety of circumstances, he feels that individuals who were informed about their performance may have been more intuitive.
Because overthinking may make intuition less reliable, if a person wasn’t being tested or wasn’t aware that they were being tested, they could have had a better chance of recognizing who was on the other end of the line.
A Consciousness That Can be Shared With Animals?
Similar studies were carried out by Sheldrake to investigate the psychic intuition of dogs and determine whether or not they are aware of the arrival of their owner.
Sheldrake observed, in the course of one experiment designed to test this concept, that a dog walked to the window seeking for its owner 4 percent of the time it was out of the house and its owner had no intention of returning home.
On the other hand, after she began to make her way back home, the dog spent around 55 percent of its time at the window.
An experiment with mice served as the basis for the first formulation of Sheldrake’s morphic resonance hypothesis. The mice were made to go through a water labyrinth, after which they gradually learned how to get out of there more quickly.
Their offspring, when placed in the same labyrinth, were able to figure out how to escape in a shorter amount of time, and as a result, mice on the other side of the globe were able to figure out how to escape rapidly when they were put through the same test.
The experiment provided proof that a mouse group could genetically pass down taught behavior, as well as that this behavior could also be transmitted psychically across an entire species; it was almost as if it were being uploaded to the cloud, where individual members could collectively download it.
This behavior was also shown to be capable of being passed down psychically over an entire species. Sheldrake’s hypothesis has this as one of its premises, and he has said that he thinks it is something that is innate to every species.
What Exactly is Meant by the Phrase “Collective Consciousness”?
The 100th monkey theory is a well-known idea that has some similarities to the morphic resonance hypothesis. This theory is based on anecdotal observations that reveal symptoms of psychic learning among monkeys on several islands in the Pacific Ocean.
It is believed that monkeys on one island learned behavior from monkeys on another island after the 100th animal on the second island learned the behavior. This scenario, according to Sheldrake, provides proof of morphic resonance, yet it is predicated on the concept of needing to achieve a critical level.
He argues that he views the process as being more progressive: the higher the number of individuals within a species that learn, the simpler it is for that species to complete a job.
The concept of a collective unconscious proposed by Carl Jung provides some support for Rupert Sheldrake’s notion. The collective unconscious proposed by Jung is, in essence, a framework consisting of innate archetypes and psychological themes that are shared by all people.
It is not the same as our individual psyches or complexes, which are created throughout the course of our lives. Even more specifically, Jung described it as a “psychic system of a universal, collective, and impersonal character that is the same in all persons.”
Sheldrake added to this notion by postulating that the collective mental system is expanding and gaining knowledge in the here and now.
Is it possible that this demonstrates that, as a species, we are collectively becoming more intelligent and that our collective awareness is progressing?
Or, is what Sheldrake is describing a physical phenomenon that can be extended via technology and the internet?
